Innovation Files has moved! For ITIF's quick takes, quips, and commentary on the latest in tech policy, go to itif.org

Why use a top-down approach when a bottom-up one will do?

When I worked at the PricewaterhouseCoopers Global Technology Centre during the height of the Internet Bubble, we were regularly visited by what we called the “Invest in <Mumble>” delegations.  These were investment authority groups from cities, states, regions, provinces, and even the occasional Principality.  Their mission: to find out what orders to issue to get a Silicon Valley in their catchment area.

I recall one group who came from an EMEA city and were wondering how to approach the problem of siting a huge multimedia facility that they were planning.  They had a list with what my then-young kids would have called a “bazillion” criteria.  It was a super-sized list, a real top-down approach.

We asked them if there were existing multimedia firms in or around the city.  They said “yes”.  We asked them if they knew which pub or pubs were the watering holes for the troops from the existing firms.  They said “yes.”

Why didn’t they site the new multimedia center near those pubs, we asked?  Amazement.  Deep respect for the geniuses from the Tech Centre.  But what had we done except port the old story about the campus paths and the first snowstorm to the new problem area?  If we had any genius, it lay in seeing that we didn’t have use a killer top-down approach.  A bottom-up one would work just fine.

Comments?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email