Innovation Files has moved! For ITIF's quick takes, quips, and commentary on the latest in tech policy, go to itif.org

New Forms of Private-Company Liquidity: Regulate or Orchestrate?

An oft-noted reason for lackluster venture returns is the lack of liquidity for private companies backed by venture capital.  For all kinds of reasons — regulatory, structural, madness-of-crowds — the IPO market for venture-backed startups has been essentially shut down for years.  Which means:

  • Valuations for companies that do exit are depressed becuase M&A buyers know there is not alternative
  • Companies need more capital to get to liquidity, which focuses investors on “certified” mega-hits rather than a broader range of innovation
  • Backers of venture capital firms shift their assets to less innovative but more lucrative asset classes, including (depressed) public stocks.

In the last two or three years a new form of liquidity for private companies has emerged, principally in the form of online marketplaces for private companies.  These companies — such as SharesPost and SecondMarket — are handling increasing volumes of transactions and, as importantly, providing another form of liquidity for private companies and their investors.  See the Q&A in Quora for some opinions about the scope and efficacy of these new media.

There are some ticklish regulatory issues with these exchanges, having to do with the gray area between a broadly-traded private company and a public company.  And there are numerous points of misalignment between shareholders, management teams, and individual (usually employee) investors in private companies whose shares may trade on these exchanges.

But a new form of liquidity is probably good news for innovation.  What do you think?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email